Yesterday, a Florida State Senate Senate committee unanimously approved Senate Bill 52 (“Bill 52”), which would impose a statewide ban on texting while driving. Similar bills have repeatedly passed through the Florida Senate, but failed in the House of Representatives. Thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia already adopted texting while driving bans.

The Florida Senate Communications Committee voted 9-0 in favor of SB 52 which outlaws texting by motorists but exempts police and other emergency vehicles. SB 52 would make texting subject to secondary enforcement, meaning that law enforcement can cite drivers for texting only if they had been stopped for another traffic violation such as speeding. Under SB 52’s provisions, an initial violation of the anti-texting law would result in a $30 fine. Further, if the illegal texting caused an accident, the driver would be assessed six points on his or her driver’s license.

A spokesperson for the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Courtney Heidelberg, stated that Florida highway safety records indicate that, of the 171,538 Florida crash reports filed during the first ten months of 2011, 149 involved drivers that were texting at the time of the accident.

According to a recent study released by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s (“Foundation”), distracted driving is a growing concern and common practice among motorists. The study, referred to as the Traffic Safety Index (“Index”), was assembled based upon data gathered from surveys of 3,896 U.S. residents over the age of sixteen. The Index concluded that, although many Americans value safe travel and support laws discouraging unsafe driving behaviors, e.g. speeding, they tend to practice dangerous driving habits themselves.

According to the Index’s findings, 88.5% of drivers consider using a cell phone while driving a serious threat to motorist safety. Additionally, 67.3% of respondents feel that distracted driving is a bigger problem today than it was three years ago. Although most of the surveyed individuals expressed concerns about distracted driving practices, they also adopted a double standard with regard to support of measures to discourage such behavior.

More than two-thirds (68.8%) of respondents confessed to using their cell phone while driving at least once in the past thirty days. 31.9% admitted to doing so “fairly often or regularly.” However, 57.9% of surveyed individuals felt that talking on a cell phone while driving was a serious threat to driver safety and 66% considered the practice to be “unacceptable.”
Just recently, a Broward court entered an order granting a plaintiff in an automobile accident case with leave to plead punitive damage based on an accident with a driver that was text messaging. Under Florida Statutes, 768.73, punitive damages may be awarded if there is “clear and convincing evidence” of reckless disregard for the life and safety of others. In Florida, this legal standard has been often been applied to drunk drivers. More and more recently however, courts are allowing plaintiffs to pursue claims for punitive damage for injury and accident victims due to text messaging. However, most personal insurance policies don’t cover punitive damages, or they are excluded under the policies, so there are practical limitations one must consider when pursuing a claim against a text messaging defendant. Considerations an experienced car accident attorney will look for include an investigation into the personal assets of the defendant, the existence of whether there is any third party liability, such as an employer/employee relationship, or some other legal theory under the law of agency.

Continue reading

Earlier today, the 3rd District Court of Appeals affirmed a Miami Dade trial court verdict of nearly 1 million dollars against Club Nikki on South Beach. The case arises from an assault that occurred at Club Nikki and the Nikki Beach Club back in August of 2009. The victim, David Millian sustained facial lacerations after another patron attacked him with a glass by the bathroom on a Saturday night. A Miami-Dade County jury awarded the Plaintiff just over one million dollars after a six day trial. The lawsuit was styled Milian v. Penrod Brothers Inc. Club Nikki Beach is owned by Penrod Brothers Inc. and is located on One Ocean Drive on South Beach. Attorneys Philip M. Gerson, Nicholas, I. Gerson & Edward S. Schwartz, PA represented sued the club based on negligence principles. Under Florida law, night club operators are liable for the negligent acts of their employees. The allegations included that the Penrod Brothers Inc, failed to provide reasonable security on the premises which resulted in serious injuries to the Plaintiff. The Miami, Florida personal injury attorneys at Gerson & Schwartz, PA specialize in premises liability, negligent security, and crime victim cases throughout Florida.

Continue reading

According to a recent story published by The Miami Herald, Texas A&M University’s Transportation Institute has issued its annual Urban Mobility Report for 2012, ranking the region encompassing Miami Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties, eleventh of the fifteen worst urban areas in the nation for traffic congestion.

The study reviewed traffic conditions and patterns in cities and suburbs across America in an attempt to quantify the amount of traffic congestion in various regions and give researchers a way to measure the degree of unreliability associated with calculating the amount of time required to make a given trip. According to the report, the only areas in the U.S. with worse traffic congestion than the South Florida region were Washington, DC, Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, New York-Newark, Boston, Houston, Atlanta, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Seattle.

Continue reading

Recently, the Bradenton Herald reported on a three-vehicle accident on U.S. Route 41 in Bradenton, Florida that occurred on Thursday evening that left two motorists injured. According to the story, at approximately 11:00 p.m., the driver of a Toyota Corolla heading south on Route 41 spun out of control, striking a wall on the shoulder and then rolling back into the southbound lane of traffic.

The motorist driving a Chevrolet Metro behind the Corolla attempted to steer left around the wreck and lost control, eventually coming to a stop in the northbound lane. A driver traveling in the northbound lane was unable to avoid a collision with the Metro. The 27 year-old woman driving the Corolla, who was seriously injured and taken to a nearby medical center, was cited by police for careless driving.

What are your legal rights after a Florida car accident?

With more and more motorists on the road every day, these types of incidents are becoming increasingly common. Safety features built into newer vehicles are trying to address the consequences of each accident, but those safety features rarely actually prevent accidents. It is important for Florida motorists to understand their rights under the law so as to be protected in event they are injured in a motor vehicle accident.

Florida is one of twelve U.S. states that employs a “no fault” insurance scheme. Under a no-fault insurance scheme, when motorists are involved auto accidents which results in injuries to either party, each driver must submit any claims for compensation to his or her own insurance company, regardless of whether either party is determined to be at fault for the accident. Florida requires that motorists carry a minimum of $10,000 of personal injury protection (“PIP”) and additional $10,000 of property damage liability (“PDL”).

PIP covers necessary medical treatment and other economic damages that might arise from a motor vehicle accident, including up to 80% of medical bills and up to 60% of lost wages.

Continue reading

A recent report prepared by the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (“AHAS”), calls on the elected officials of all fifty states to adopt 15 basic traffic safety laws that the AHAS maintains have the potential to save thousands of lives and billions of dollars each year.

According to the report, states that adopt the laws will benefit by reducing the number of preventable deaths and injuries due to traffic accidents, save on medical and work loss costs such as Medicaid, hospitalization, emergency responders and law enforcement, and qualify for federal grants designed to encourage enactment of traffic safety programs. The release also contains a report card grading each state’s efforts to adopt the proposed laws.

Fourteen states and the District of Columbia received “green” ratings, indicating significant advancement toward adopting all of the recommended laws. Six states received a “red” rating, indicating poor performance due to a dangerous lack of basic traffic safety laws. Florida was one of thirty states to receive a “yellow” rating, indicating that a “moderately positive performance but with numerous gaps still in [its] highway
According to the report, Florida saw 2,398 traffic fatalities in 2011 and suffered an average annual economic cost due to motor vehicle accidents of $14.4 billion. So which recommended traffic laws is Florida missing?

Continue reading

On January 7, 2012, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) released Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 14 calling for manufacturers of hybrid and electric automobiles to ensure that their vehicles meet certain minimum sounds standards set forth by the federal Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Ac, (“PSEA”). Passed in 2010, the PSEA directs mandates the Secretary of Transportation promulgate motor vehicle safety standards establishing a requirement that electric and hybrid vehicles provide an alert sound to make pedestrians aware of the approaching vehicles.

According to an NHTSA press release, as a result of the fact they don’t rely on gasoline-power at low speeds, electric and hybrid engines are much quieter and difficult to perceive upon approach than their combustion-based counterparts. Standard 141 seeks to remedy this problem by requiring manufacturers to outfit electric/hybrid vehicles with some mechanism to emit a sound that is detectable beneath a wide range of street noises and ambient sound when the automobile is moving at less than eighteen miles per hour.

According to NHTSA Administrator David Strickland, the proposal would “[A]llow manufacturers the flexibility to design different sounds for different makes and models while still providing an opportunity for pedestrians, bicyclists and the visually impaired to detect and recognize a vehicle and make a decision about whether it is safe to cross the street.”

Last week, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (“USPSC”), issued an advisory to consumers to check their homes for certain cold weather products which were previously recalled due to safety concerns.

According to the press release, consumers should be looking for four specific products which, although recalled over the summer, likely saw little or no use until the cold weather hit. Those products are ECHO Bear Cat log splitters, Big Lots portable ceramic space heaters, Harbor Breeze bath fans, and Snowpulse Avalanche airbags.

Each of these products suffers from a defect which renders it dangerous for use. For example, according to the press release, the ECHO Bear Cat log splitter suffers from a design flaw where the “end cap of the log splitter’s hydraulic cylinder can break away from the body of the log splitter, posing an impact hazard to the user or bystander.” At the time of the original press release in June of 2012, the manufacturer of the log splitter, Crary Industries, had received three reports of the hydraulic cylinder end caps detaching, with one of the instances resulting in an injury from the cylinder striking the user in the head.

Recently CentralNY published a story on a tragic fatal Florida car accident that took the life of a college student. Details on the auto accident remain sparse, as authorities are still investigating to determine exactly what happened. What is known is that a 22-year old was on his way back to Santa Fe College in Gainesville after having spent the holiday season with his family. He was traveling south on Interstate 95 on Sunday when, for reasons that have yet to be determined, his car careened off the road. The vehicle eventually slammed into the concrete base of an overhead sign. The impact was severe, and the student did not survive the collision.

The Miami, Florida Auto accident attorneys at Gerson & Schwartz, PA say it is far too early to make any claims about whether or not there might be civil liability in this case. The road conditions may have been poor, items from another vehicle may have been in the road, his car could have malfunctioned, or any number of other factors may had led to the tragic accident.

Continue reading

Car accidents strike countless times each and every day throughout Florida. There are many different types of accidents, from drivers failing to see a stop sign to drivers talking on a cell phone and drifting into a different lane. In fact, frequently the causes of an accident are myriad, many different factors combine to cause a collision, often with significant property damage and personal injury.

Because of this many community members who are involved in these Florida car accidents have questions about how the law deals with cases where different parties are both partially at fault for the accident. Can you still recover for part of your losses even if you weren’t driving perfectly at the time of the incident?

Continue reading

New Personal Injury Protection Laws Now Effective

New motor vehicle accident laws go into effect today, (actually as of 1/1/2013)
along with many other new laws across the nation. Motorists in Florida should now be aware of how the changes will affect them in the event of a car accident. “Personal Injury Protection” is a type of insurance that all motorists in the state of Florida are required to purchase by law. The changes in PIP will now lower the amount of money injury and accident victims can obtain for medical treatment and compensation regardless of the fault paid for by their own insurance company. The laws now create additional obstacles to obtain the full benefits. The laws have been enacted to help combat the questionable medical care, medical bills, fraud, and other forms of what some consider to be questionable treatment such acupuncture. It’s not that you can’t still get this care, the only difference is in the amount of money your insurance will pay for medical treatment and how much they will have to pay. The new law can be found under , House Bill 119.)
Under the new PIP laws, if an insured does not seek medical treatment within 14 days of the accident, PIP will not pay any medical expenses. This is different from past PIP laws as there was no time limit to seek benefits until now.

Although there is medical literature that states it is not uncommon injuries to manifest after 14 days after an accident, it also not unusual for people who sustain serious bodily injuries in that time frame. But also, when you consider the the difficulty in obtaining an medical appointment some people may be out of luck under the now existing law in the state of Florida.

Drivers, medical providers, chiropractors, and attorneys handling car accident cases should familiarize themselves with the new provisions. The now current law is that unless the medical treatment is for an “Emergency Medical Condition,” PIP payments will be limited to $2,500. this differs from the prior $10,0000.00 one could obtain. Also emergency medical care is defined in the new legislation as: (1) Serious jeopardy to patient health; (2) serious impairment to bodily function; (3) serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part.)

Continue reading

Contact Information